Impact of Equity in Social Protection Spending on Income Poverty and Inequality
-
Published:2023-08-06
Issue:1-2
Volume:169
Page:697-721
-
ISSN:0303-8300
-
Container-title:Social Indicators Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Soc Indic Res
Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to investigate whether higher equity in government social protection spending strongly predicts positive changes in income poverty and inequality. Our approach was to regress the measures of absolute poverty and inequality on the indicators of equity in social protection spending at the country level, controlling for the level of spending and the country wealth measured by per capita GDP. For that purpose, we have compiled a dataset of 535 observations from 101 countries over years 1998–2017, including 199 observations for 70 low- and middle-income countries from Europe, Asia, North and South America, and Africa. Our findings support the proposition that equity in social spending (measured by the share of social protection spending going to the bottom quintile) is a significant and strong predictor of improved distributional outcomes (poverty measured at Int$1.90 a day and inequality measured by the Gini index). Moreover, in low- and middle-income countries in our sample the poverty and inequality reducing impact of this equity measure is stronger than in the sample including all countries. The presence of a significant gap in equity of social protection spending between the high-income countries and the rest of countries included in the study signifies that there is a large potential in improving equity in social protection spending in low- and middle-income countries. Social protection reforms in these countries should be focused on extending the coverage of social protection programs and improving access to social protection for the poorest segments of the population.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference34 articles.
1. Addison, T., Niño-Zarazúa, M., & Tarp, F. (2015). Aid, social policy and development. Journal of International Development, 27(8), 1351–1365. 2. Adema, W., Fron, P., & Ladaique, M. (2014). How much do OECD countries spend on social protection and how redistributive are their tax/benefit systems? International Social Security Review, 67(1), 1–25. 3. Arancibia, C., Dondo, M., Jara, H. X., Macas, D., Oliva, N., Riella, R., Rodriguez, D., & Urraburu, J. (2019). Income redistribution in Latin America: A microsimulation approach. WIDER Working Paper 2019/1. 4. Arndt, C., McKay, A., & Tarp, F. (Eds.). (2016). Growth and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford. 5. Bárcena-Martín, E., Lacomba, B., Moro-Egido, A. I., & Pérez-Moreno, S. (2014). Country differences in material deprivation in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(4), 802–820.
|
|