Abstract
AbstractIn the analysis of the difference in the distribution and profiles of the equitable and sustainable well-being, the territorial dimension is a fundamental reading-key for local policies since it allows the areas of advantage or relative deprivation to emerge more accurately. Specifically, in Italy the provincial level coincides with the administrative area of metropolitan cities, which are the subject of growing attention from European and national policies. The BES 2018 report by Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) has confirmed that from 2015 an improvement in many areas of well-being has been marked, even if territorial differences remain stable both in levels and dynamics. These differences appear in some cases as real structural differences between the North and South of Italy. Then, the measures of equitable and sustainable well-being in the territories allow, in various degrees, to deepen and specify this situation employing synthetic measures of well-being. In this work, we propose a statistical methodology focused on the simultaneous partial least squares structural equation modeling and simultaneous K-means clustering to obtain a composite indicator of Italian well-being and at the same time a classification of Italian territorial micro-areas by means of the just updated provincial data about BES 2018. In this way, the territorial differences of well-being can be more reliably and more exactly defined on the basis of the relationships among all elementary indicators and domains proposed in the analysis of well-being by ISTAT.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference90 articles.
1. Adler, A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement, and recommendations. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i1.429.
2. Afsa C., & Blanchet, D. (2008). Survey of existing approaches to measuring socioeconomic progress. Working paper retrieved from the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, website: https://www.insee.fr/fr/statisti-ques/fichier/2550927/SurveyofExistingApproaches.pdf.
3. Allin, P., & Hand, D. J. (2014). The wellbeing of nations: Meaning, motive and measurement. New York, NY: Wiley.
4. Allin, P., & Hand, D. J. (2017). New statistics for old?-measuring the wellbeing of the UK. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society), 180(Part I), 3–43.
5. Bache, I. (2019). How does evidence matter? Understanding ‘what works’ for wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 1153–1173.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献