Composite Indicators to Measure Quality of Working Life in Europe: A Systematic Review

Author:

Stefana ElenaORCID,Marciano FilippoORCID,Rossi DianaORCID,Cocca PaolaORCID,Tomasoni GiuseppeORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the last two decades, Quality of Working Life (QWL) has become a core element of the European social model and the European Employment Strategy. “More and better jobs” is a strategic goal promoted within Europe for emphasising the attention in QWL. However, there is a large debate in the literature on the definition of QWL, its dimensions, and consequently on the methods to use for its measurement. To the best of our knowledge, the systematic reviews currently available in the literature on QWL measurement in European organisations investigate only a particular industry and/or working population. Moreover, they do not focus specifically on composite indicators, although they appear promising in facilitating QWL understanding and comparisons for supporting decision-makers and policy makers. To overcome these gaps, we conducted a systematic review to identify composite indicators for measuring QWL in European organisations. The review returned 19 studies that are analysed based on a set of factors related to QWL locutions, index name, geographical area, industry or population, level of analysis, dimensions, type of data, inputs, outputs, and test and/or validation. The results highlight a significant heterogeneity among the indicators, confirming the lack of an agreed upon QWL composite indicator for Europe. Such heterogeneity concerns also QWL dimensions. A critical comparison of the different composite indicators is provided, along with a unifying proposal of QWL macro-dimensions. Several gaps in the literature are pointed out suggesting directions for future research.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Brescia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference81 articles.

1. Addabbo, T., Facchinetti, G., Mastroleo, G., & Solinas, G. (2007). A fuzzy way to measure quality of work in a multidimensional perspective. In J. Pejaś & K. Saeed (Eds.), Advances in Information Processing and Protection. (pp. 13–23). Springer.

2. Argentero, P., Miglioretti, M., & Angilletta, C. (2007). Quality of work life in a cohort of italian health workers. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, 29(1), A50–A54

3. Arranz, J. M., García-Serrano, C., & Hernanz, V. (2018). Employment quality: Are there differences by types of contract? Social Indicators Research, 137, 203–230

4. Bäck-Wiklund, M., van der Lippe, T., den Dulk, L., & Doorne-Huiskes, A. (Eds.). (2011). Quality of Life and Work in Europe. Theory, Practice and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

5. Bang, H., & Lee, S. (2006). The definition of ‘Good Job’ and determinant. The Korean Sociology, 1, 93–126

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3