(Re)Configuring Hybrid Meetings: Moving from User-Centered Design to Meeting-Centered Design

Author:

Saatçi BanuORCID,Akyüz KayaORCID,Rintel SeanORCID,Klokmose Clemens NylandstedORCID

Abstract

Despite sophisticated technologies for representational fidelity in hybrid meetings, in which co-located and remote participants collaborate via video or audio, meetings are still often disrupted by practical problems with trying to include remote participants. In this paper, we use micro-analysis of three disruptive moments in a hybrid meeting from a global software company to unpack blended technological and conversational practices of inclusion and exclusion. We argue that designing truly valuable experiences for hybrid meetings requires moving from the traditional, essentialist, and perception-obsessed user-centered design approach to a phenomenological approach to the needs of meetings themselves. We employ the metaphor of ‘configuring the meeting’ to propose that complex ecologies of people, technology, spatial, and institutional organization must be made relevant in the process of design.

Funder

Microsoft Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference46 articles.

1. Akrich, Madeleine (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker and J. Law (eds): Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.

2. Arnfalk, Peter; and Beatrice Kogg (2003). Service transformation—managing a shift from business travel to virtual meetings. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 11, pp. 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00158-0.

3. Bødker, Susanne (1996). Applying Activity Theory to Video Analysis: How to Make Sense of Video Data in HCI. In B. Nardi (ed): Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, MIT Press, pp. 147–174.

4. Bødker, Susanne (2015). Third-wave HCI, 10 years later---participation and sharing. Interactions, vol. 22, pp. 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405.

5. Boros, Elizabeth (2004). Virtual Shareholder Meetings. Duke Law & Technology Review, vol. 3, pp. 1–10.

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Characterizing Software Maintenance Meetings: Information Shared, Discussion Outcomes, and Information Captured;Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering;2024-02-06

2. Mirrorverse: Live Tailoring of Video Conferencing Interfaces;Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology;2023-10-29

3. Transitional Blended Realities: Linking between Video and Mixed Reality for Distributed Team Collaboration;2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct);2023-10-16

4. Perspectives: Creating Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meeting Experiences;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2023-09-28

5. Mobility and Utility in Robot Mediated Interaction;Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction;2023-09-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3