Dissimilarity in flea and host assemblages and their interaction networks along a spatial distance gradient: different patterns revealed by different network dissimilarity metrics-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dissimilarity in flea and host assemblages and their interaction networks along a spatial distance gradient: different patterns revealed by different network dissimilarity metrics

Published:2024-06 Issue:2 Volume:205 Page:397-409
ISSN:0029-8549
Container-title:Oecologia
language:en
Short-container-title:Oecologia

Author:

Krasnov Boris R.^ORCID,Barki Goni,Khokhlova Irina S.

Funder

Israel Science Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00442-024-05578-z.pdf

Reference84 articles.

1. Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x

2. Astorga A, Oksanen J, Luoto M, Soininen J, Virtanen R, Muotka T (2012) Distance decay of similarity in freshwater communities: do macro- and microorganisms follow the same rules? Global Ecol Biogeogr 21:365–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00681.x

3. Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta-diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x

4. Baselga A, Jiménez-Valverde A, Niccolini G (2007) A multiple-site similarity measure independent of richness. Biol Lett 3:642–645. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0449

5. Brimacombe C, Bodner K, Michalska-Smith M, Poisot T, Fortin MJ (2023) Shortcomings of reusing species interaction networks created by different sets of researchers. PLoS Biol 21:e3002068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002068