Competing judgments: Multiple election observers and post-election contention-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Competing judgments: Multiple election observers and post-election contention

Published:2024-01-19 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1559-7431
Container-title:The Review of International Organizations
language:en
Short-container-title:Rev Int Organ

Author:

Morrison Kelly^ORCID,Donno Daniela,Savun Burcu,Davutoglu Perisa

Funder

University of Cyprus

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11558-023-09528-x.pdf

Reference133 articles.

1. Abbink, J. (2006). Discomfiture of democracy? The 2005 election crisis in Ethiopia and its aftermath. African Affairs, 105(419), 173–199.

2. Ananda, A., & Bol, D. (2021). Does knowing democracy affect answers to democratic support questions? A survey experiment in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 433–443.

3. Arceneaux, C., & Leithner, A. (2017). International monitors. In P. Norris & A. Nai (Eds.), Election watchdogs: Transparency, accountability and integrity. Oxford University Press.

4. Bader, M. (2018). Disinformation in elections. Security and Human Rights, 29, 24–35.

5. Baker, P. (2001). Europe denounces election but will not isolate Belarus. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/09/11/europe-denounces-election-but-will-not-isolate-belarus/f4426234-5a944f00-b185f168d0fc68bd/. Accessed 5 Jan 2024.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Illiberal regimes and international organizations;The Review of International Organizations;2024-08-02

2. Zombies ahead: Explaining the rise of low-quality election monitoring;The Review of International Organizations;2024-07-26