Clubs of autocrats: Regional organizations and authoritarian survival

Author:

Debre Maria J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractWhile scholars have argued that membership in Regional Organizations (ROs) can increase the likelihood of democratization, we see many autocratic regimes surviving in power albeit being members of several ROs. This article argues that this is the case because these regimes are often members in “Clubs of Autocrats” that supply material and ideational resources to strengthen domestic survival politics and shield members from external interference during moments of political turmoil. The argument is supported by survival analysis testing the effect of membership in autocratic ROs on regime survival between 1946 to 2010. It finds that membership in ROs composed of more autocratic member states does in fact raise the likelihood of regime survival by protecting incumbents against democratic challenges such as civil unrest or political dissent. However, autocratic RO membership does not help to prevent regime breakdown due to autocratic challenges like military coups, potentially because these types of threats are less likely to diffuse to other member states. The article thereby adds to our understanding of the limits of democratization and potential reverse effects of international cooperation, and contributes to the literature addressing interdependences of international and domestic politics in autocratic regimes.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies

Universität Potsdam

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Political Science and International Relations

Reference136 articles.

1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042001001

2. Acharya, A. (2003). Democratisation and the prospects for participatory regionalism in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659032000074646

3. Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism beyond EU-centrism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. (pp. 109–132). Oxford University Press.

4. Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. I. (2007). Conclusion: Institutional features, cooperation effects, and the agenda for further research on comparative regionalism. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional institutions in comparative perspective. (pp. 244–278). Cambridge University Press.

5. Ahlquist, J. S., & Wibbels, E. (2012). Riding the wave: World trade and factor-based models of democratization. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00572.x

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reconsidering the costs of commitment: Learning and state acceptance of the UN human rights treaties’ individual complaint procedures;The Review of International Organizations;2024-09-02

2. Illiberal regimes and international organizations;The Review of International Organizations;2024-08-02

3. Zombies ahead: Explaining the rise of low-quality election monitoring;The Review of International Organizations;2024-07-26

4. The life cycle of international cooperation: Introduction to the special issue;The Review of International Organizations;2024-07-11

5. Good governance in autocratic international organizations;The Review of International Organizations;2024-06-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3