Tourist species bias estimates of extrapolated species density in dispersive taxa: a case study from a litter beetle assemblage in temperate woodland
-
Published:2021-03-24
Issue:1
Volume:22
Page:107-112
-
ISSN:1585-8553
-
Container-title:Community Ecology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
Author:
Eggleton PaulORCID, Smith Jo, Holdsworth Sholto, Inward Kelly, Carpenter Dan
Abstract
AbstractExtrapolative nonparametric estimators of species density are commonly used in community ecology. However, they are dependent on either (1) their use on non-dispersive taxa, or (2) the ability to separate tourists from residents in dispersive taxa. We undertook ten years of leaf litter sampling in an ancient woodland in the New Forest, Southern England. We identified all the beetles from those samples and assigned them a residency status (residents, stratum tourists, and habitat tourists). Extrapolations, using the Chao 2, first- and second-order jackknife, and bootstrap approaches, of all sampled beetles all showed large overestimates of species richness when compared with extrapolations based on just residents. We recommend that the estimators should be used with caution as estimates of actual species density for dispersive taxa unless the natural history of most species in a community is well known. This applies especially to tropical ecosystems where many species have not been described. This reinforces the need for more descriptive natural history.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference25 articles.
1. Able, K. W. (2016). Natural history: an approach whose time has come, passed, and needs to be resurrected†. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73, 2150–2155. 2. Anderson, R. S., & Ashe, J. S. (2000). Leaf litter inhabiting beetles as surrogates for establishing priorities for conservation of selected tropical montane cloud forests in Honduras, Central America (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae, Curculionidae). Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 617–653. 3. Basset, Y., Cizek, L., Cuenoud, P., Didham, R., Guilhaumon, F., Missa, O., Novotny, V., Odegaard, F., Roslin, T., Schmidl, J., Tishechkin, A., Winchester, N., Roubik, D., Aberlenc, H., Bail, J., Barrios, H., Bridle, J., Castano-Meneses, G., Corbara, B., … Leponce, M. (2012). Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science, 338, 1481–1484. 4. Chen, I. C., Hill, J. K., Shiu, H.-J., Holloway, J. D., Benedick, S., Chey, V. K., Barlow, H. S., & Thomas, C. D. (2011). Asymmetric boundary shifts of tropical montane Lepidoptera over four decades of climate warming. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 34–45. 5. Coddington, J. A., Agnarsson, I., Miller, J. A., Kuntner, M., & Hormiga, G. (2009). Undersampling bias: The null hypothesis for singleton species in tropical arthropod surveys. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 573–584.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|