Abstract
AbstractSustainability of agriculture is difficult to measure and assess because it is a multidimensional concept that involves economic, social and environmental aspects and is subjected to temporal evolution and geographical differences. Existing studies assessing agricultural sustainability in the European Union (EU) are affected by several shortcomings that limit their relevance for policy makers. Specifically, most of them focus on farm level or cover a small set of countries, and the few exceptions covering a broad set of countries consider only a subset of the sustainable dimensions or rely on cross-sectional data. In this paper, we consider yearly data on 12 indicators (5 for the economic, 3 for the social and 4 for the environmental dimension) measured on 26 EU countries in the period 2004–2018 (15 years), and apply group-based multivariate trajectory modeling to identify groups of countries with common trends of sustainable objectives. An expectation-maximization algorithm is proposed to perform maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data without relying on an explicit imputation procedure. Our results highlight three groups of countries with distinguished strong and weak sustainable objectives. Strong objectives common to all the three groups include improvement of productivity, increase of personal income in rural areas, reduction of poverty in rural areas, increase of production of renewable energy, rise of organic farming and reduction of nitrogen balance. Instead, enhancement of manager turnover and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions are weak objectives common to all the three groups of countries. Our findings represent a valuable resource to formulate new schemes for the attribution of subsidies within the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation,Statistics and Probability,Analysis
Reference48 articles.
1. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19(6), 716–723 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
2. Antle, J.M., Ray, S.: Sustainable Agricultural Development: An Economic Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, CH (2020)
3. Boker SM, Neale MC, Maes HH, Wilde MJ, Spiegel M, Brick TR, Estabrook R, Bates TC, Mehta P, von Oertzen T, Gore RJ, Hunter MD, Hackett DC, Karch J, Brandmaier A, Pritikin JN, Zahery M, Kirkpatrick RM (2018) Openmx user guide (release 2). https://vipbg.vcu.edu/vipbg/OpenMx2/docs//OpenMx/latest/OpenMxUserGuide.pdf
4. Bozdogan, H.: Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52(3), 345–370 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294361
5. Cataldo R, Crocetta C, Grassia MG, Lauro NC, Marino M, Voytsekhovska V (2020) Methodological PLS-PM framework for SDGs system. Social Indicators Research published: 20 January 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02271-5
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献