Retrospective and Prospective Analysis on “Sexting”: Indicators of Productivity, Dispersion, and Content (2009–2019)

Author:

Rodríguez-García Antonio Manuel,Moreno-Guerrero Antonio José,García-Carmona MarinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the last decade, research on “sexting” has undergone an exponential increase, giving rise to the publication of numerous studies clarifying its meaning, offering information of educational value, and favoring a good use of technology to prevent problems caused by this exchange of sexual information. The aim of this article was to analyze the production, performance, impact, and content of scientific articles evaluating the “sexting” thesaurus (title, abstract, and/or keywords) between 2009 and September 2019. Articles were sourced from two internationally recognized databases: Scopus and Web of Science. A scientometric study was then carried out on a sample of 641 articles that met the established inclusion criteria. The main findings indicate that “sexting” is a very recent research focus, but one in full growth phase, with scientific production related to the topic likely to double over the next few years. Although “sexting” has been researched worldwide, the scientific production of the US and American authors is the most notable. There were also some differences between the Scopus and Web of Science databases, mainly in the volume of production and the trend. However, the studies do show a common research line, “cyberbullying,” and a common target population: adolescents. Therefore, the content analysis reveals that research on “sexting” is mostly carried out with adolescents and takes into consideration other themes such as cyberbullying, dating violence, and sexuality.

Funder

Universidad de Granada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference47 articles.

1. Alonso, C., & Romero, E. (2019). Sexting behaviours in adolescents: Personality predictors and psychosocial outcomes in a one-year follow-up. Annals of Psychology, 35(2), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.35.2.339831

2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.

3. Bas Peña, E., & Pérez de Guzmán, M. V. (2010). Desafíos de la familia actual ante la escuela y las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Educatio Siglo XXI, 28(1), 41–68.

4. Best, J. (2019). Knock, knock–who’s scared?: The knockout game as a short-lived crime problem. Deviant Behavior, 40(10), 1289–1303.

5. Brown, J. D., Keller, S., & Stern, S. (2009). Sex, sexuality, sexting, and sexed: Adolescents and the media. The Prevention Researcher, 16(4), 12–17.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3