Measuring Men’s Gender Norm Beliefs Related to Contraception: Development of the Masculine Norms and Family Planning Acceptance Scale

Author:

Newmann Sara J.,Zakaras Jennifer Monroe,Dworkin Shari L.ORCID,Withers Mellissa,Ndunyu Louisa,Gitome Serah,Gorrindo Phillip,Bukusi Elizabeth A.,Rocca Corinne H.

Abstract

AbstractMale partner resistance is identified as a key factor that influences women’s contraceptive use. Examination of the masculine norms that shape men’s resistance to contraception—and how to intervene on these norms—is needed. To assess a gender-transformative intervention in Kenya, we developed and evaluated a masculinity-informed instrument to measure men’s contraceptive acceptance—the Masculine Norms and Family Planning Acceptance (MNFPA) scale. We developed draft scale items based on qualitative research and administered them to partnered Kenyan men (n = 150). Item response theory-based methods were used to reduce and psychometrically evaluate final scale items. The MNFPA scale had a Cronbach’s α of 0.68 and loaded onto a single factor. MNFPA scores were associated with self-efficacy and intention to accept a female partner’s use of contraception; scores were not associated with current contraceptive use. The MNFPA scale is the first rigorously developed and psychometrically evaluated tool to assess men’s contraceptive acceptance as a function of male gender norms. Future work is needed to test the MNFPA measure in larger samples and across different contexts. The scale can be used to evaluate interventions that seek to shift gender norms to increase men’s positive engagement in pregnancy spacing and prevention.

Funder

University of Ghana Building a New Generation of Academics in Africa (Banga-Africa) Project with funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference84 articles.

1. Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., Macaskill, G., Haldane, S. A., & Sun, X. X. (2016). ACER ConQuest version 4.5.0: Generalized item response modeling software. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research and Berkeley: University of California (2016).

2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

3. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council for Measurement in Psychology (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

4. Apanga, P. A., & Adam, M. A. (2015). Factors influencing the uptake of family planning services in the Talensi District Ghana. The Pan African Medical Journal, 20, 10. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.20.10.5301.

5. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3