The Fertility of Hebephiles and the Adaptationist Argument Against Including Hebephilia in DSM-5-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Fertility of Hebephiles and the Adaptationist Argument Against Including Hebephilia in DSM-5

Published:2010-02-20 Issue:4 Volume:39 Page:817-818
ISSN:0004-0002
Container-title:Archives of Sexual Behavior
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Sex Behav

Author:

Blanchard Ray

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7.pdf

Reference3 articles.

1. Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Cantor, J. M. (2010). Sexual attraction to others: A comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men. Manuscript submitted for publication.

2. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., …, Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350.

3. Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of “hebephilia”: A response to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 319–320.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Other Specified Paraphilic Disorder: Patterns of Use in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations;Sexual Abuse;2024-08-09

2. The Criminalisation of Fantasy Material;2018-07-03

3. Evidence of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Hebephilia;Archives of Sexual Behavior;2016-11-29

4. The Puzzle of Male Chronophilias;Archives of Sexual Behavior;2016-08-22

5. Danger and Difference: The Stakes of Hebephilia;History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences;2015