DSM-5 Pedophilic Disorder: Are the Age and Number of Victims Significant Variables?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

DSM-5 Pedophilic Disorder: Are the Age and Number of Victims Significant Variables?

Published:2014-09-03 Issue:7 Volume:43 Page:1247-1252
ISSN:0004-0002
Container-title:Archives of Sexual Behavior
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Sex Behav

Author:

Mongeau Valérie,Rouleau Joanne-Lucine

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-014-0373-4.pdf

Reference25 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2010). Proposed draft revisions to DSM disorders and criteria. http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186 .

2. Blanchard, R. (2010). The specificity of victim count as a diagnostic indicator of pedohebephilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1245–1252.

3. Blanchard, R. (2011). Misdiagnoses of pedohebephilia using victim count: A reply to Wollert and Cramer (2011) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1081–1088.

4. Blanchard, R. (2012). The proposal to add intense or preferential sexual interest in early pubescent children to the DSM-5 diagnosis of pedophilic disorder. Retrieved from http://sajrt.blogspot.ca/2012/01/guest-blog-by-dsm-5-paraphilias.html .

5. Blanchard, R. (2013). A dissenting opinion on DSM-5 pedophilic disorder [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 675–678.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Confronting religious and spiritual discrimination in clinical and professional practice.;Spirituality in Clinical Practice;2023-07-06

2. Paraphilias;Current Opinion in Psychiatry;2015-11