Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis

Author:

van der Hoek-Snieders Hanneke E. M.ORCID,van den Heuvel Antonius J. M. L.,van Os-Medendorp Harmieke,Kamalski Digna M. A.

Abstract

AbstractThis systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (reference test) in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The search resulted in eight studies (334 fetuses) to be included: four prospective and four retrospective studies. The applicability concern was low. There was, however, a risk of selection and information bias. All studies showed that MRI well predicted the chance of cleft palate. The sensitivity results were homogeneous, but heterogeneity was assumed regarding the specificity estimate (Cochrane’s Q test: p = 0.00). The pooled sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99); the pooled specificity was 0.94 (0.89–0.97). The area under the curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.98–0.99).Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that MRI has an excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity for diagnosing cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Future research should assess applicability for clinical care.What is Known:Using ultrasound for prenatal detection of cleft palate leads to misdiagnosis frequently.MRI could potentially improve the prenatal detection rate of cleft palate.What is New:Eight studies describe the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting cleft palate.Combined results show excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity.

Funder

Utrecht University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference47 articles.

1. Arangio P, Manganaro L, Pacifici A, Basile E, Cascone P (2013) Importance of fetal MRI in evaluation of craniofacial deformities. J Craniofac Surg 24:773–776

2. Beaty TH, Marazita ML, Leslie EJ (2016) Genetic factors influencing risk to orofacial clefts: today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. F1000Research 5:2800

3. Bekiesińska-Figatowska M, Brągoszewska H, Romaniuk-Doroszewska A, Duczkowska A, Jaczyńska R, Maciejewski TM (2014) The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Dev Period Med 18:27–32

4. Bělobrádek Z, Žižka J, Klzo L et al (2013) Utilizing magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal detection of cleft lip and palate clefts. Ces Radiol 67:209–213

5. Biau DJ, Kernéis S, Porcher R (2008) Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2282–2288

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3