Abstract
AbstractThis systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (reference test) in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The search resulted in eight studies (334 fetuses) to be included: four prospective and four retrospective studies. The applicability concern was low. There was, however, a risk of selection and information bias. All studies showed that MRI well predicted the chance of cleft palate. The sensitivity results were homogeneous, but heterogeneity was assumed regarding the specificity estimate (Cochrane’s Q test: p = 0.00). The pooled sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99); the pooled specificity was 0.94 (0.89–0.97). The area under the curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.98–0.99).Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that MRI has an excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity for diagnosing cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Future research should assess applicability for clinical care.What is Known:• Using ultrasound for prenatal detection of cleft palate leads to misdiagnosis frequently.• MRI could potentially improve the prenatal detection rate of cleft palate.What is New:• Eight studies describe the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting cleft palate.• Combined results show excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Arangio P, Manganaro L, Pacifici A, Basile E, Cascone P (2013) Importance of fetal MRI in evaluation of craniofacial deformities. J Craniofac Surg 24:773–776
2. Beaty TH, Marazita ML, Leslie EJ (2016) Genetic factors influencing risk to orofacial clefts: today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. F1000Research 5:2800
3. Bekiesińska-Figatowska M, Brągoszewska H, Romaniuk-Doroszewska A, Duczkowska A, Jaczyńska R, Maciejewski TM (2014) The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Dev Period Med 18:27–32
4. Bělobrádek Z, Žižka J, Klzo L et al (2013) Utilizing magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal detection of cleft lip and palate clefts. Ces Radiol 67:209–213
5. Biau DJ, Kernéis S, Porcher R (2008) Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2282–2288
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献