Author:
Motoki Noriko,Inaba Yuji,Shibazaki Takumi,Misawa Yuka,Ohira Satoshi,Kanai Makoto,Kurita Hiroshi,Tsukahara Teruomi,Nomiyama Tetsuo,Kamijima Michihiro,Yamazaki Shin,Ohya Yukihiro,Kishi Reiko,Yaegashi Nobuo,Hashimoto Koichi,Mori Chisato,Ito Shuichi,Yamagata Zentaro,Inadera Hidekuni,Nakayama Takeo,Iso Hiroyasu,Shima Masayuki,Kurozawa Youichi,Suganuma Narufumi,Kusuhara Koichi,Katoh Takahiko,
Abstract
AbstractAbnormal maternal gestational weight gain (GWG) increases the risk of obstetric-related complications. This investigation examined the impact of GWG on infant neurodevelopmental abnormalities at 12 months of age using the data of a nationwide Japanese cohort study. Questionnaire data were obtained from the ongoing Japan Environment and Children’s Study cohort study. Maternal GWG was subdivided as below, within, or above the reference values of the Institution of Medicine pregnancy weight guidelines. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3) is a parent-reported developmental screening instrument for children across five domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving, and personal–social. Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed to identify correlations between GWG and developmental delay defined as ASQ-3 scores of less than two standard deviations below the mean. A total of 30,694 mothers with singleton live births and partners who completed the questionnaire were analyzed. The prevalence of mothers below, within, and above the GWG guidelines was 60.4% (18,527), 32.1% (9850), and 7.5% (2317), respectively. We recorded 10,943 infants (35.7%) who were outliers in at least one ASQ-3 domain. After controlling for covariates, GWG below established guidelines was associated with a significantly higher risk of developmental delay for the communication (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.34), gross motor (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05–1.24), fine motor (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.24), problem-solving (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.18), and personal–social (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07–1.24) domains.Conclusion: This large survey revealed a possible deleterious effect of insufficient maternal GWG on infant neurodevelopment.Trial registration: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on January 15, 2018 (number UMIN000030786).
What is Known:• Inappropriate maternal gestational weight gain may cause obstetric complications and adverse birth outcomes.• Excess maternal weight gain may result in gestational diabetes, hypertension, eclampsia, caesarean delivery, and macrosomia, while insufficient maternal weight gain has been associated with pre-term birth and small for gestational age.
What is New:• This study provides important information on a possible adverse effect of insufficient maternal gestational weight gain on offspring neurodevelopment at 12 months of age.• Our findings indicate a need to reconsider the optimal body mass index and gestational weight gain for women desiring pregnancy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference43 articles.
1. Oberklaid F, Efron D (2005) Developmental delay–identification and management. Aust Fam Physician 34:739–742
2. Blumberg SJ, Bramlett MD, Kogan MD, Schieve LA, Jones JR, Lu MC (2013) Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011–2012. Natl Health Stat Report 65:1–11
3. Boyle CA, Boulet S, Schieve LA et al (2011) Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics 127:1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2989
4. Simeonsson RJ, Sharp MC (1992) Developmental delays. In: Hoekelman RA, Friedman SB, Nelson NM et al (ed) Primary pediatric care. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp 867–870
5. Gottlieb CA, Maenner MJ, Cappa C, Durkin MS (2009) Child disability screening, nutrition, and early learning in 18 countries with low and middle incomes: data from the third round of UNICEF’s Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (2005–06). Lancet 374:1831–1839. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61871-7