Socioeconomic position, family context, and child cognitive development

Author:

González LlúciaORCID,Popovic MajaORCID,Rebagliato MarisaORCID,Estarlich MarisaORCID,Moirano GiovenaleORCID,Barreto-Zarza FlorenciaORCID,Richiardi LorenzoORCID,Arranz EnriqueORCID,Santa-Marina LoretoORCID,Zugna DanielaORCID,Ibarluzea JesúsORCID,Pizzi CostanzaORCID

Abstract

AbstractSocioeconomic position (SEP) may have different effects on cognitive development and family context could play a role in this association. This work aimed to analyse the role of socioeconomic positions, measured via various indicators collected longitudinally, in cognitive development at 7–11 years of age, evaluating the role of family context as a potential mediator. The study sample included 394 and 382 children from the INMA Gipuzkoa and Valencia cohorts, respectively. SEP indicators were assessed during pregnancy (family social class, parental education, employment, and disposable income) and at 7 (Gipuzkoa) and 11 (Valencia) years of age (At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE)). Family context and cognitive development were measured with the Haezi-Etxadi Family Assessment Scale 7–11 (HEFAS 7–11) and Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (Raven’s CPM), respectively. Linear regression models were developed to assess the relationships between (a) SEP-family context, (b) SEP-cognitive development, and (c) family context-cognitive development, adjusting for a priori-selected confounders. Simple and multiple mediation analyses were performed to explore the role of family context in the SEP-cognitive development relationship. Lower SEP was related with a lower cognitive score, this association being particularly robust for family social class. SEP indicators were related to subscales of family context, in particular those regarding cognitive stimulation, parental stress, and parenting. A relationship was also found between these three subscales and child cognitive development, mediating the effect of family social class on child cognition by 5.2, 5.5, and 10.8%, respectively, and 12.0% jointly.    Conclusion: Both family SEP and context contribute to a child’s cognitive development. Equalising policies and positive parenting programmes could contribute to improving cognitive development in children. What is Known:• Parental social class, education, and employment status have been widely employed to measure socioeconomic position. What is New:• This work focuses on standard measurements of socioeconomic position but also other economic indicators such as the EHII and AROPE, and their effect on child cognitive development and family context.• Promotion of cognitive and linguistic development, parental stress and conflict, and parental profile fostering child development mediated the effect of family social class on cognitive development.

Funder

UE

ISCIII

CIBERESP

European Union-Next Generation EU and the Ministerio de Universidades

Generalitat Valenciana

Department of Health of the Basque Government

Provincial Government of Gipuzkoa

Agreements with Zumarraga, Urretxu, Legazpi, Azkoitia, Azpeitia, and Beasain

Universitat de Valencia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. American Psychological Association (APA) (2021) Cognitive development – APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-development. Accessed 11 Nov 2021

2. Babakr ZH, Mohamedamin P, Kakamad K (2019) Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: critical review. Educ Q Rev 2:517–524

3. Berk LE (1998) Desarrollo del niño y del adolescente, 1a. Pearson Prentice Hall, Madrid

4. Burneo-Garcés C, Cruz-Quintana F, Pérez-García M et al (2019) Interaction between socioeconomic status and cognitive development in children aged 7, 9, and 11 years: a cross-sectional study. Dev Neuropsychol 44:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2018.1554662

5. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M (2010) Estrategias europeas para la lucha contra las desigualdades sociales en salud: Desarrollando el máximo potencial de salud para toda la población - Parte 2 (publicado originalmente como Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 2). Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social (originalmente publicado por la Oficina Regional de la OMS para Europa)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3