Abstract
AbstractWe aimed to compare disclosure of social risks according to self-report on an iPad versus face-to-face questions from a health professional and to explore carers’ experiences of screening. This two-arm, parallel group, randomized trial was conducted from January 19, 2021, to December 17, 2021, in a public hospital pediatric ward serving a disadvantaged area of an Australian capital city. Carers of children aged ≤ 5 years admitted to the Children’s Ward were eligible. The primary outcome was disclosure of social risks. The screener included nine items on food security, household utilities, transport, employment, personal and neighborhood safety, social support, housing and homelessness. Disclosure of social risks was similar between the self-completion (n = 193) and assisted-completion (n = 193) groups for all 9 items, ranging 4.1% higher for worrying about money for food (95% CI − 11.4, 3.1%) among the assisted-completion group, to 5.7% (−1.6, 13.0%) higher for unemployment among the self-completion group. In qualitative interviews, participants were positive about screening for social risks in the hospital ward setting and the majority indicated a preference for self-completion. Conclusion: Differences in the disclosure of social risks according to self- versus assisted-completion were small, suggesting that either method could be used. Most carers expressed a preference for self- completion, which is therefore recommended as the ideal mode for such data collection for Australian pediatric inpatient settings. Trial registration: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (www.anzctry.org.au; #ACTRN12620001326987; date of registration 8 December 2020).
What is Known:• Most evidence on screening of social risks in pediatric inpatient settings is from the USA.• Little is known about disclosure of social risks in countries with universal health care and social welfare.
What is New:• Disclosure of social risks was similar for electronic compared with face-to-face screening.• Carers preferred electronic completion over face-to-face completion.
Funder
University of Adelaide’s Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, under the Strategic Research Support Scheme
The University of Wollongong
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
2. Brettell M, Fenton C, Foster E (2022) Linking leeds: a social prescribing service for children and young people. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:3
3. Khan H, Giacura BC, Sanderson J, Dixon M, Leitch A, Cook C et al (2023) Social prescribing around the world: a world map of global developments in social prescribing across different health system contexts. Global Social Prescribing Alliance World Health Organization, National Academic for Social Prescribing, Geneva, Switzerland
4. Davey F, McGowan V, Birch J, Kuhn I, Lahiri A, Gkiouleka A et al (2022) Levelling up health: a practical, evidence-based framework for reducing health inequalities. Public Health Pract (Oxf) 4:100322
5. Corscadden L, Levesque JF, Lewis V, Strumpf E, Breton M, Russell G (2018) Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis. Int J Equity Health 17(1):28