Exploring the acceptance of telehealth within palliative care: A self-determination theory perspective

Author:

Keenan Joseph,Rahman Rachel,Hudson Joanne

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this paper was to explore potential divergence and convergence in relation to health care professionals’ and patients’ acceptability of the use of telehealth within palliative care provision through the lens of Self-Determination Theory. The research utilized a deductive qualitative approach utilizing semi-structured interviews to explore divergence and convergence between health care professionals’ preconceptions of the use of telehealth in palliative care and the lived experiences of patients accessing support in this manner. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with both professionals and patients to explore whether the barriers and benefits of telehealth perceived by professionals corresponded to the patient’s lived experience of utilizing the technology in their palliative care. Interviews were analyzed using a deductive thematic analysis. Professionals and patients identified that the use of telehealth could satisfy the need for autonomy, however this manifested in different ways. Greater divergence was apparent between patient and professional perceptions about how telehealth could satisfy the need for relatedness and competence needs. The findings of this paper highlight how professionals preconceived concerns about the use of telehealth in relation to providing supportive palliative care may not be realized when exploring the experiences of patients accessing services through this medium. This paper highlights the important role of psychological need satisfaction when considering acceptability of telehealth, and motivation to engage in the implementation of technologically driven health services.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Bioengineering,Biotechnology

Reference26 articles.

1. Koch S. Home telehealth—current state and future trends. International journal of medical informatics. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.09.002.2005.09.002.

2. Robinson CA, Pesut B, Bottorff JL. Issues in rural palliative care: views from the countryside. J Rural Health. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00268.x.

3. Department of Health and Social Care. End of Life Care Strategy: Promoting high quality care for adults at the end of life. 2008. www.gov.uk/government/publications/end-of-life-care-strategy-promoting-high-quality-care-for-adults-at-the-end-of-their-life. Accessed 11th Jan 2021.

4. Longley M, Llewellyn M, Beddow T. Mid-Wales Healthcare Study - Report for Welsh Government. 2014. www.midwalesjointcommittee.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/1158/MWHS_Report_-_WIHSC_for_Welsh_Government.pdf . Accessed 11th Jan 2021.

5. Whitten P, Doolittle G, Mackert M. Telehospice in Michigan: use and patient acceptance. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910402100307.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3