Exploring the implicit meanings of ‘cultural diversity’: a critical conceptual analysis of commonly used approaches in medical education
-
Published:2024-09-14
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1382-4996
-
Container-title:Advances in Health Sciences Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adv in Health Sci Educ
Author:
Zanting AlbertineORCID, Frambach Janneke M.ORCID, Meershoek AgnesORCID, Krumeich AnjaORCID
Abstract
AbstractExisting approaches to cultural diversity in medical education may be implicitly based on different conceptualisations of culture. Research has demonstrated that such interpretations matter to practices and people concerned. We therefore sought to identify the different conceptualisations espoused by these approaches and investigated their implications for education. We critically reviewed 52 articles from eight top medical education journals and subjected these to a conceptual analysis. Via open coding, we looked for references to approaches, their objectives, implicit notions of culture, and to implementation practices. We iteratively developed themes from the collected findings. We identified several approaches to cultural diversity teaching that used four different ways to conceptualise cultural diversity: culture as ‘fixed patient characteristic’, as ‘multiple fixed characteristics’, as ‘dynamic outcome impacting social interactions’, and as ‘power dynamics’. We discussed the assumptions underlying these different notions, and reflected upon limitations and implications for educational practice. The notion of ‘cultural diversity’ challenges learners’ communication skills, touches upon inherent inequalities and impacts how the field constructs knowledge. This study adds insights into how inherent inequalities in biomedical knowledge construction are rooted in methodological, ontological, and epistemological principles. Although these insights carry laborious implications for educational implementation, educators can learn from first initiatives, such as: standardly include information on patients’ multiple identities and lived experiences in case descriptions, stimulate more reflection on teachers’ and students’ own values and hierarchical position, acknowledge Western epistemological hegemony, explicitly include literature from diverse sources, and monitor diversity-integrated topics in the curriculum.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference91 articles.
1. Ajjawi, R., Crampton, P. E. S., Ginsburg, S., Mubuuke, G. A., Hauer, K. E., Illing, J., Mattick, K., Monrouxe, L., Nadarajah, V. D., Vu, N. V., Wilkinson, T., Wolvaardt, L., & Cleland, J. (2022). Promoting inclusivity in health professions education publishing. Medical Education, 56(3), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14724 2. Ang, W., Verpooten, L., De Winter, B., & Bombeke, K. (2020). Stereotype rebound: From cultural competence to diversity awareness. Medical Education, 54(5), 468–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14110 3. Blackie, M., Wear, D., & Zarconi, J. (2019). Narrative intersectionality in caring for marginalized or disadvantaged patients: Thinking beyond categories in medical education and care. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002425 4. Bleakley, A. (2017). The perils and rewards of critical consciousness raising in medical education. Academic Medicine, 92(3), 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001426 5. Bochatay, N., Bajwa, N. M., Ju, M., Appelbaum, N. P., & van Schaik, S. M. (2022). Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: Bias and the intersection of social identities. Medical Education, 56(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14602
|
|