Leveraging the health equity implementation framework to foster an equity focus in medical education

Author:

Ramadurai DeepaORCID,Shea Judy A.

Abstract

AbstractTeaching equitable clinical practice is of critical importance, yet how best to do so remains unknown. Educators utilize implementation science frameworks to disseminate clinical evidence-based practices (EBP). The Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF) is one of these frameworks, and it delineates how health equity may be concomitantly assessed and addressed in planning the implementation of an EBP. The HEIF therefore lays a strong foundation to understand and explain barriers and facilitators to implementation through an equity lens, making it well-suited for use by medical educators. Three equity-focused frames of reference within the model include (1) the clinical encounter, (2) societal context, and (3) culturally relevant factors, herein referred to as domains. The HEIF provides a structure for prospective and retrospective assessment of how EBP are taught and ultimately incorporated into clinical practice by trainees, with specific attention to delivering equitable care. We present three examples of common topics in internal medicine, contextualized by the three equity domains of the HEIF. We additionally acknowledge the limitations of this framework as a research tool with complex features that may not be suitable for brief teaching in the clinical environment. We propose a 360-degree learner assessment to ensure implementation of this framework is successful. By encouraging trainees to explore the narrative experiences of their patients and examine their own implicit biases, the HEIF provides a structure to address gaps in knowledge about delivering equitable care.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. AAMC (2021). Addressing and Eliminating Racism at the AAMC and Beyond. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/addressing-and-eliminating-racism-aamc-and-beyond

2. AAMC (2020). AAMC Statement on Police Brutality and Racism in America and Their Impact on Health [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/aamc-statement-police-brutality-and-racism-america-and-their-impact-health

3. ACGME (2022). Equity Matters CME Learning Path. Retrieved from https://dl.acgme.org/learning-paths/equity-matters-cme-learning-path

4. Chow, C. J., Hirshfield, L. E., & Wyatt, T. R. (2022). Sharpening our tools: Conducting Medical Education Research using critical theory. Teaching And Learning In Medicine, 34(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1946401

5. Council, A. M. (2012). Standards for Assessment and Accreditation of Primary Medical Programs by the Australian Medical Council 2012. Retrieved from Kingston, Australia.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3