Author:
Schiefer U.,Pätzold J.,Wabbels B.,Dannheim F.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Arend KO, Redbrake C (2005) Update prospektiver Glaukomstudien. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 222:807–813
2. Artes PH, McLeod D, Henson DB (2002) Response time as a discriminator between true- and false-positive responses in suprathreshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:129–132
3. Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2000) False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2201–2204
4. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H (1997) A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:368–375
5. Brown SM, Bradley JC, Monhart M, Baker DK (2005) Normal values for Octopus tendency oriented perimetry in children 7 through 13 years old. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:886–893
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献