Abstract
AbstractIn a study of student understanding of negative definite integrals at two institutions, we administered a written survey and follow-up clinical interviews at one institution and found that “backward integrals”, where the integral was taken from right to left on the x-axis, were the most difficult for students to interpret. We then conducted additional interviews focused on backward integrals at a second institution. Our analysis uses the concept image framework and a recent categorical framework for mathematical sense making. We found that students were most successful using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to determine the sign of an integral when a symbolic expression was provided. When considering a definite integral in a graphical context, students often had difficulty if they viewed the integral as a spatial area, stating that area must always be positive. Some students were able to conceptualize $$\Delta x$$
Δ
x
or $$dx$$
dx
as a difference or change and thus a signed quantity; when these students were able to view the area as a sum of smaller pieces, they were more successful in justifying a negative backward integral. Students who used amounts or similar images often had difficulty making sense of the negative sign. Even more progress was made when students either invoked or were asked explicitly about a specific physical context to be represented by the backward integral, other than spatial area. The context provided a meaning to the difference represented by $$\Delta x$$
Δ
x
or $$dx$$
dx
and thus to the sign of that difference and the definite integral.
Funder
Division of Undergraduate Education
Maine Academic Prominence Initiative
Maine Economic Improvement Fund
West Virginia University ADVANCE Sponsorship Program
West Virginia University Department of Mathematics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Reference47 articles.
1. Artigue, M., Menigaux, J., & Viennot, L. (1990). Some aspects of students’ conceptions and difficulties about differentials. European Journal of Physics, 11(5), 262–267.
2. Bajracharya, R. R., Wemyss, T. M., & Thompson, J. R. (2012). Student interpretation of the signs of definite integrals using graphical representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413(1), 111–114.
3. Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750–762.
4. Bezuidenhout, J., & Olivier, A. (2000). Students’ conceptions of the integral. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–73). ERIC.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献