Abstract
AbstractIn recent decades, there has been rapid development in digital technologies for automated assessment. Through enhanced possibilities in terms of algorithms, grading codes, adaptivity, and feedback, they are suitable for formative assessment. There is a need to develop computer-aided assessment (CAA) tasks that target higher-order mathematical skills to ensure a balanced assessment approach beyond basic procedural skills. To address this issue, research suggests the approach of asking students to generate examples. This study focuses on an example-generation task on polynomial function understanding, proposed to 205 first-year engineering students in Sweden and 111 first-year biotechnology students in Italy. Students were encouraged to collaborate in small groups, but individual elements within the tasks required each group member to provide individual answers. Students' responses kept in the CAA system were qualitatively analyzed to understand the effectiveness of the task in extending the students’ example space in diverse educational contexts. The findings indicate a difference in students’ example spaces when performing the task between the two educational contexts. The results suggest key strengths and possible improvements to the task design.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Chandler, K. (2017). Student connections between algebraic and graphical polynomial representations in the context of a polynomial relation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 915–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9730-1
2. Antonini, S. (2006). Graduate students’ processes in generating examples of mathematical objects. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 57–64). PME.
3. Barana, A., Conte, A., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018). A model of formative automatic assessment and interactive feedback for STEM. 2018 IEEE 42nd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2018.00178
4. Barana, A., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2021). Interactive feedback for learning mathematics in a digital learning environment. Education Sciences, 11(6), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060279
5. Best, M., & Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2017). The function concept at the transition to upper secondary school level: Tasks for a situation of change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0880-6