Why Culture and Philosophy Matter for the Studies of Algorithmic Recommender Systems. An Example from the Time Prior to the Outbreak of the Russian–Ukrainian War in 2022

Author:

Hamidy ElenaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study, conducted through 2020–2022, was an attempt to model a situation in which Russian-speaking users wanted to use YouTube to inform themselves about Crimea’s annexation, and who would then progress by watching videos relevant to the question, picking only relevant recommendations from the list of recommendations made by YouTube throughout the three stages of the experiment. The aim of the data collection was to explore filter bubbles, maintained by YouTube’s recommender algorithm, concerning this polarising issue. As a result, a network was detected which showed recommendations relevant to the topic and which was dominated by videos with positive evaluations of the Crimean annexation. A characteristic performance feature of this network is strong mutual relations, as they frequently related back to each other. As there are dependencies between the research design and the outcome, a conceptual discussion of methods in the field was included as well as the claim to broaden the perspective and to integrate the concepts of philosophy, sociology, and culture studies. In this regard, I follow Andreas Reckwitz’s understanding of the Web as ‘culture machine’ and adapt his notion of personalisation as singularisation as well as Elena Esposito's understanding of artificial communication between humans and algorithms.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference43 articles.

1. Nicas J. YouTube Cut Down Misinformation. Then It Boosted Fox News: In: The New York Times. 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/03/technology/youtube-misinformation-fox-news.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

2. Maak MM. “YouTube recommendations are toxic” says dev who worked on the algorithm: In: TNW News. 2019. https://thenextweb.com/news/youtube-recommendations-toxic-algorithm-google-ai. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

3. Hutchings S, Tolz V, Chatterje-Doody PN. The RT Challenge: How to respond to Russia’s international broadcaster: In: The University of Manchester. 2019. https://reframingrussia.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/reframing-russia-policy-brief-july-2019-.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

4. Chatterje-Doody PN, Crilley R. Making Sense of Emotions and Affective Investments in War: RT and the Syrian Conflict on YouTube. MaC. 2019;7(3):167–78. https://doi.org/10.1764/mac.v7i3.1911.

5. Malinowski T, Eshoo AG. Letter of The Congress of the United States to Sundar Pichai and Susan Wojcicki. 2021. https://malinowski.house.gov/sites/malinowski.house.gov/files/Letter%20to%20YouTube%20--%20Malinowski_Eshoo_final_0.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3