Assessing Temporal Relational Responding in Young Children
-
Published:2023-02-14
Issue:2
Volume:73
Page:163-182
-
ISSN:0033-2933
-
Container-title:The Psychological Record
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychol Rec
Author:
Neufeld JacobORCID, Stewart IanORCID, McElwee John
Abstract
AbstractRelational frame theory (RFT) sees temporal relational responding (e.g., A is after B; B is before A) as a key operant skill involved in the understanding of time. From this perspective relating events temporally is important for everyday life situations such as sequencing events, planning, and talking about the past or future. The aim of the present research was to assess performance on a test of temporal relational responding in young children at increasing levels of complexity. Twenty-five typically developing children between 3 and 8 years were assessed on tasks of nonarbitrary (i.e., based on physical events) and arbitrary (i.e., based on contextual cues only) temporal relations. Results showed a correlation between overall performance across temporal relational responding tasks and age. Performance on nonarbitrary “before” and “after” trials improved similarly with age whereas with arbitrary relations, participants performed much more poorly on “after” trials than on “before” trials and some interesting cohort specific patterns were also seen. Implications of the results and future research directions are discussed.
Funder
National University Ireland, Galway
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference69 articles.
1. Amidon, A., & Carey, P. (1972). Why five-year-olds cannot understand before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(4), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80022-7 2. Barnes, D., McCullagh, P. D., & Keenan, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392844 3. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., Healy, O., Lyddy, F., Cullinan, V., & Hayes, S. C. (2001). Psychological development. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 157–180). Kluwer Academic/Plenum. 4. Barnes-Holmes, D., Staunton, C., Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Commins, S., Walsh, D., Stewart, I., Smeets, P. M., & Dymond, S. (2005). Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: Testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2005.78-04 5. Barron, B. F., Verkuylen, L., Belisle, J., Paliliunas, D., & Dixon, M. R. (2019). Teaching “then-later” and “here-there” relations to children with autism: An evaluation of single reversals and transformation of stimulus function. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(1), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0216-1
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|