Abstract
AbstractImportation in fictional discourse is the phenomenon by which audiences include information in the story over and above what is explicitly stated by the narrator. This paper argues that importation is distinct from generation, the phenomenon by which truth in fiction may outstrip what is made explicit, and draws a distinction between fictional truth and fictional records. The latter comprises the audience’s picture of what is true according to the narrator. The paper argues that importation into fictional records operates according to principles that also govern ordinary conversation. An account of fictional records as a species of common ground information is proposed. Two sources of importation are described in detail, presupposition accommodation and conversational implicatures. It is shown that presuppositions are both mandatorily imported and mandatorily generated. By contrast, conversational implicatures are neither mandatorily imported nor mandatorily generated. The paper distinguishes conversational implicatures from contextual inferences. Both rely on background assumptions, yet conversational implicatures moreover depend on assumptions concerning Gricean cooperation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy
Reference56 articles.
1. Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language, 9, 124–162.
2. Badura, C., & Berto, F. (2018). Truth in fiction, impossible worlds, and belief revision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 97, 178–193.
3. Barker, C. (1995). Possessive descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
4. Barker, C. (2011). Possessives and relational nouns. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. 2, pp. 1109–1130). Berlin: de Gruyter.
5. Bonomi, A., & Zucchi, S. (2003). A pragmatic framework for truth in fiction. Dialectica, 57(2), 103–120.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Fictional force;Philosophical Studies;2023-09-07
2. OUP accepted manuscript;British Journal of Aesthetics;2021