Abstract
AbstractIndicative conditionals with present tense antecedents can have ‘shifted’ readings that are unexpected given the semantic behavior of the tenses outside of conditionals. In this paper, we compare two accounts of this phenomenon due to Kaufmann (J Semant 22(3):231–280, 2005) and Schulz (SALT XVIII, pp. 694–710, 2008), by reconstructing them in the framework of branching time. We then propose a novel account of indicative conditionals based on the branching time semantics suggested in Rumberg (J Logic Lang Inf 25(1):77–108, 2016), viz. transition semantics. We show that not only is the account of ‘shifted’ readings with present tense antecedents within this semantics very natural, but it also is empirically superior to its rivals in some respects.
Funder
deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft
h2020 marie sklodowska-curie actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy
Reference27 articles.
1. Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Imperatives in dialogue. In P. Kuehnlein, H. Rieser, & H. Zeevat (Eds.), Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Burgess, J. P. (1978). The unreal future. Theoria, 44(3), 157–179.
3. Condoravdi, C. (2002). Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In D. Beaver, L. C. Martínez, B. Clark, & S. Kaufmann (Eds.), The construction of meaning (pp. 59–88). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
4. Condoravdi, C., & Lauer, S. (2015). Hypothetical facts and hypothetical goals in the temporal dimension. Presentation given at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Leipzig.
5. Copley, B. (2008). Temporal orientation in conditionals. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), Time and modality (pp. 59–77). Dordrecht: Springer