Abstract
AbstractWe present a logic of evidence that reduces agents’ epistemic idealisations by combining classical propositional logic with substructural modal logic for formulas in the scope of epistemic modalities. To this aim, we provide a neighborhood semantics of evidence, which provides a modal extension of Fine’s semantics for relevant propositional logic. Possible worlds semantics for classical propositional logic is then obtained by defining the set of possible worlds as a special subset of information states in Fine’s semantics. Finally, we prove that evidence is a hyperintensional and non-prime notion in our logic, and provide a sound and complete axiomatisation of our evidence logic.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Anderson, A. R., & Belnap, N. D. (1975). Entailment: The logic of relevance and neccessity, Vol. I. Princeton University Press
2. Baldi, P., & Hosni, H. (2020). Depth-bounded belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 123, 26–40.
3. Beall, J., Brady, R., Dunn, J., et al. (2012). On the ternary relation and conditionality. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, 1–18.
4. Bendana, J., & Mandelbaum, E. (2021). The fragmentation of belief, chap 3 (pp. 78–107). The Fragmented Mind: Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. van Benthem, J., & Pacuit, E. (2011). Dynamic logics of evidence-based belief. Studia Logica, 99, 61–92.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Epistemic Logics for Relevant Reasoners;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2024-08-29