1. Borel, E. (1907). Un paradoxe économique: le sophisme du tas de blé et les vérités statistiques. La Revue du Mois, 4, 688–699. English translation by P. Égré and E. Gray, in Erkenntnis(79), 1081-1088, 2014 [An economic paradox: the sophism of the heap of wheat and statistical truths].
2. Burnett, H. (2015). Gradability in natural language: Logical and grammatical foundations. Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
3. Cobreros, P. (2011). Supervaluationism and Fara’s argument concerning higher-order vagueness In Egré, P., & Klinedinst, N. (Eds.), Vagueness and language use (pp. 207–221). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, D. (2014). Vagueness, truth and permissive consequence In Achouriotti, D., Galinon, H., & Martinez, J. (Eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth. Berlin: Springer. In press.
5. Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2012). Tolerance and mixed consequence in the s’valuationist setting. Studia Logica, pp. 1–23.