Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference117 articles.
1. Priest, G. (1994). The structure of the paradoxes of self-reference. Mind, 103(409), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/103.409.25.
2. Priest, G. (1995). Beyond the limits of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Dummett, M. (1975). The philosophical basis of intuitionistic logic. In M Dummett (Ed.) Truth and Other Enigmas (pp. 215–247). Harvard UP.
4. Prawitz, D. (1977). Meaning and proofs: On the conflict between classical and intuitionistic logic. Theoria, 43(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1977.tb00776.x.
5. van Atten, M. (2017). The development of intuitionistic logic. In E N Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/intuitionistic-logic-development/. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Relevance Logic;2024-03-28
2. Routes to relevance: Philosophies of relevant logics;Philosophy Compass;2024-02
3. Stratified restricted universals;Asian Journal of Philosophy;2023-08-01
4. Hyperintensionality in Relevant Logics;Logic, Rationality, and Interaction;2023
5. Weak relevant justification logics;Journal of Logic and Computation;2022-09-06