Abstract
AbstractIn a recent paper, Barrio, Tajer and Rosenblatt establish a correspondence between metainferences holding in the strict-tolerant logic of transparent truth ST+ and inferences holding in the logic of paradox LP+. They argue that LP+ is ST+’s external logic and they question whether ST+’s solution to the semantic paradoxes is fundamentally different from LP+’s. Here we establish that by parity of reasoning, ST+ can be related to LP+’s dual logic K+. We clarify the distinction between internal and external logic and argue that while ST+’s nonclassicality can be granted, its self-dual character does not tie it to LP+ more closely than to K+.
Funder
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Gobierno de España
Agence nationale de la recherche
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sequent Calculi for First-order $$\textrm{ST}$$;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2024-07-02
2. RELEVANT CONSEQUENCE RELATIONS: AN INVITATION;The Review of Symbolic Logic;2023-06-30
3. In search of philosophical method;A Plea for Plausibility;2023-03-17
4. Truth and Falsity in Buridan’s Bridge;Synthese;2023-01-05
5. The Final Cut;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2022-11-14