Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we will consider the existing notions of bilateralism in the context of proof-theoretic semantics and propose, based on our understanding of bilateralism, an extension to logical multilateralism. This approach differs from what has been proposed under this name before in that we do not consider multiple speech acts as the core of such a theory but rather multiple consequence relations. We will argue that for this aim the most beneficial proof-theoretical realization is to use sequent calculi with multiple sequent arrows satisfying some specific conditions, which we will lay out in this paper. We will unfold our ideas with the help of a case study in logical tetralateralism and present an extension of Almukdad and Nelson’s propositional constructive four-valued logic by unary operations of meaningfulness and nonsensicality. We will argue that in sequent calculi with multiple sequent arrows it is possible to maintain certain features that are desirable if we assume an understanding of the meaning of connectives in the spirit of proof-theoretic semantics. The use of multiple sequent arrows will be justified by the presence of congruentiality-breaking unary connectives.
Funder
European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. Almukdad, A., & Nelson, D. (1984). Constructible Falsity and Inexact Predicates. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49, 231–233.
2. Avron, A., & Lev, I. (2001). Canonical Propositional Gentzen-Type Systems. In R. Goré, A. Leitsch, and T. Nipkow (eds), Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2001 (pp. 529–544). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2083. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
3. Ayhan, S. (2021). Uniqueness of Logical Connectives in a Bilateralist Setting. In I. Sedlár & M. Blicha (Eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2020 (pp. 1–16). College Publications.
4. Ayhan, S., & Wansing, H. (2023). On synonymy in proof-theoretic semantics. The case of 2Int. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 52(2), 187–236.
5. Belnap, N. (1962). Tonk, Plonk and Plink. Analysis, 22(6), 130–134.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献