Author:
Fursov Ilya,Christie Mike,Lord Gabriel
Abstract
AbstractOne way to quantify the uncertainty in Bayesian inverse problems arising in the engineering domain is to generate samples from the posterior distribution using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. The basic MCMC methods tend to explore the parameter space slowly, which makes them inefficient for practical problems. On the other hand, enhanced MCMC approaches, like Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), require the gradients from the physical problem simulator, which are often not available. In this case, a feasible option is to use the gradient approximations provided by the surrogate (proxy) models built on the simulator output. In this paper, we consider proxy-aided HMC employing the Gaussian process (kriging) emulator. We overview in detail the different aspects of kriging proxies, the underlying principles of the HMC sampler and its interaction with the proxy model. The proxy-aided HMC algorithm is thoroughly tested in different settings, and applied to three case studies—one toy problem, and two synthetic reservoir simulation models. We address the question of how the sampler performance is affected by the increase of the problem dimension, the use of the gradients in proxy training, the use of proxy-for-the-data and the different approaches to the design points selection. It turns out that applying the proxy model with HMC sampler may be beneficial for relatively small physical models, with around 20 unknown parameters. Such a sampler is shown to outperform both the basic Random Walk Metropolis algorithm, and the HMC algorithm fed by the exact simulator gradients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computers in Earth Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference40 articles.
1. Punq-S3 model. Available from: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/earth-science/research/research-groups/perm/standard-models/
2. Abdollahzadeh A, Reynolds A, Christie M, Corne D, Davies B, and Williams G, (2011) Bayesian optimization algorithm applied to uncertainty quantification, in SPE-143290-MS
3. Beck, J., Guillas, S.: Sequential design with mutual information for computer experiments (MICE): emulation of a tsunami model. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif. 4(1), 739–766 (2016)
4. Betancourt M, Byrne S, and M. Girolami, (2015) Optimizing the integrator step size for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv
5. Bilionis, I., Zabaras, N.: Multi-output local Gaussian process regression: applications to uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys. 231, 5718–5746 (2012)
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献