Third International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions)

Author:

Elfgen ConstanzeORCID,Leo Cornelia,Kubik-Huch Rahel A.,Muenst Simone,Schmidt Noemi,Quinn Cecily,McNally Sorcha,van Diest Paul J.,Mann Ritse M,Bago-Horvath Zsuzsanna,Bernathova Maria,Regitnig Peter,Fuchsjäger Michael,Schwegler-Guggemos Daniela,Maranta Martina,Zehbe Sabine,Tausch Christoph,Güth Uwe,Fallenberg Eva Maria,Schrading Simone,Kothari Ashutosh,Sonnenschein Martin,Kampmann Gert,Kulka Janina,Tille Jean-Christophe,Körner Meike,Decker Thomas,Lax Sigurd F.,Daniaux Martin,Bjelic-Radisic Vesna,Kacerovsky-Strobl Stephanie,Condorelli Rosaria,Gnant Michael,Varga Zsuzsanna

Abstract

AbstractThe heterogeneous group of B3 lesions in the breast harbors lesions with different malignant potential and progression risk. As several studies about B3 lesions have been published since the last Consensus in 2018, the 3rd International Consensus Conference discussed the six most relevant B3 lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), radial scar (RS), papillary lesions (PL) without atypia, and phyllodes tumors (PT)) and made recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Following a presentation of current data of each B3 lesion, the international and interdisciplinary panel of 33 specialists and key opinion leaders voted on the recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). In case of B3 lesion diagnosis on CNB, OE was recommended in ADH and PT, whereas in the other B3 lesions, vacuum-assisted excision was considered an equivalent alternative to OE. In ADH, most panelists (76%) recommended an open excision (OE) after diagnosis on VAB, whereas observation after a complete VAB-removal on imaging was accepted by 34%. In LN, the majority of the panel (90%) preferred observation following complete VAB-removal. Results were similar in RS (82%), PL (100%), and FEA (100%). In benign PT, a slim majority (55%) also recommended an observation after a complete VAB-removal. VAB with subsequent active surveillance can replace an open surgical intervention for most B3 lesions (RS, FEA, PL, PT, and LN). Compared to previous recommendations, there is an increasing trend to a de-escalating strategy in classical LN. Due to the higher risk of upgrade into malignancy, OE remains the preferred approach after the diagnosis of ADH.

Funder

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference85 articles.

1. AGO German Commission Breast SoAG. AGO German Commission Breast, State of Art Guidelines 2022 2022 [Available from: https://www.ago-online.de/en/leitlinien-empfehlungen/leitlinien-empfehlungen/kommission-mamma. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

2. Rageth CJ, EAM O’F, Pinker K, Kubik-Huch RA, Mundinger A, Decker T et al (2019) Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Breast Cancer Res Tr 174(2):279–296

3. S3-Richtlinien. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. S3-Leitlinie Früherkennung, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms, Version 4.4. Mai 2021 2021 [Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-045OLl_S3_Mammakarzinom_2021-07.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

4. WHO. Breast Tumours WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition2019. https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4758580. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

5. Forester ND, Lowes S, Mitchell E, Twiddy M (2019) High risk (B3) breast lesions: what is the incidence of malignancy for individual lesion subtypes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(4):519–527

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3