Targeted NGS on sequential bone marrow biopsies aids in the evaluation of cytopenias and monocytosis and documents clonal evolution—a proof of principle study
-
Published:2023-08-23
Issue:6
Volume:483
Page:835-845
-
ISSN:0945-6317
-
Container-title:Virchows Archiv
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Virchows Arch
Author:
Nann DominikORCID, Rau Achim, Mahmutovic Lejla, Steinhilber Julia, Meca Vanessa, Federmann Birgit, Vogel Wichard, Bonzheim IrinaORCID, Quintanilla-Martinez LeticiaORCID, Fend FalkoORCID
Abstract
AbstractDifferential diagnosis of clonal versus reactive cytopenia and monocytosis, respectively, frequently presents a diagnostic challenge. With the two recent classifications of myeloid disorders, mutational analysis has gained importance as a diagnostic tool. However, reports on its utility on trephine bone marrow biopsies (BMB) are sparse. The aim of our proof of principle study was to determine the suitability of targeted sequencing for the longitudinal evaluation of cytopenia and monocytosis and demonstration of clonal evolution on sequential BMB. Seventy-seven EDTA-decalcified BMB of 33 patients with peripheral cytopenia and/or monocytosis, including at least one follow-up biopsy/patient, were included. Initial morphological diagnoses were idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS, 8 cases), MDS (without blast increase, 7 cases), MDS with increased blasts/excess blasts (MDS-IB/EB) (11 cases), and CMML (7 cases). Thirty-one genes relevant for myeloid disorders were examined using two custom AmpliSeq NGS panels. Mutations were found in the initial BMB of 5/8 cases of ICUS, thus changing the diagnosis to clonal cytopenia of unknown significance (CCUS), 5/7 MDS, 10/11 MDS-IB/EB, and 7/7 CMML. Clonal evolution was observed in 14/33 (42%) cases, mostly associated with disease progression. None of the wild-type patients acquired mutations during follow-up. NGS-based mutation profiling is a robust diagnostic tool for BMB and provides valuable additional information, especially for cases with no/minimal dysplasia, and for better risk stratification of MDS. Tracking variant allele frequency and appearance of mutations over time allows for observing clonal evolution or relapse.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference42 articles.
1. Malcovati L, Porta MG, Pascutto C, Invernizzi R, Boni M, Travaglino E, Passamonti F, Arcaini L, Maffioli M, Bernasconi P, Lazzarino M, Cazzola M (2005) Prognostic factors and life expectancy in myelodysplastic syndromes classified according to WHO criteria: a basis for clinical decision making. J Clin Oncol 23:7594–7603. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7038 2. Malcovati L, Germing U, Kuendgen A, Della Porta MG, Pascutto C, Invernizzi R, Giagounidis A, Hildebrandt B, Bernasconi P, Knipp S, Strupp C, Lazzarino M, Aul C, Cazzola M (2007) Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 25:3503–3510. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5696 3. Hasserjian RP, Orazi A, Brunning RD, Germing U, Le Beau MM, Porwit A, Baumann I, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, List AF, Cazzola M, Foucar K (2017) Myelodysplastic syndromes: overview. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J (eds) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, revised, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, France, pp 98–106 4. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, Sultan C (1982) Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 51:189–199 5. Germing U, Strupp C, Kundgen A, Bowen D, Aul C, Haas R, Gattermann N (2004) No increase in age-specific incidence of myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 89:905–910
|
|