Author:
Alinger-Scharinger Beate,Kronberger Cornelia,Hutarew Georg,Hitzl Wolfgang,Reitsamer Roland,Frederike Klaassen-Federspiel,Hager Martina,Fischer Thorsten,Sotlar Karl,Jaksch-Bogensperger Heidi
Abstract
AbstractHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is characterized by an aggressive clinical course. In the case of HER2 overexpression/amplification, patients benefit from HER2-targeting therapies. Standardized diagnostic HER2 assessment includes immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH). The aim of this study was to compare this “gold standard” with the Droplet Digital™ polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a method that allows sensitive and precise detection of copy number variations (CNV) in FFPE (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) DNA samples. Partitioning of the PCR reaction into 20,000 droplets enables a precise quantitative “CN” discrimination also in heterogeneous samples. FFPE breast cancer samples (n = 170) with routinely assessed HER2 status by IHC/ISH were retrospectively analyzed using the ddPCR CNV ERBB2 assay. Comparison of HER2 status assessment by the two methods revealed concordant results in 92.9% (158/170) of the cases. Discrepant cases were verified and interpreted. For ddPCR, a cut off value of 3 HER2 copies was set to distinguish between HER2-negative and HER2-positive BC. Results obtained with the ddPCR CNV ERBB2 assay were consistent and reproducible, and serial dilutions demonstrated a high stability and sensitivity of the method. The ddPCR CNV ERBB2 assay may be a specific and convenient tool to quantify HER2 copy numbers in BC samples. In our study, this method showed high reproducibility in accuracy of HER2 assessment compared to IHC/ISH analysis.
Funder
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität
Österreichische Krebshilfe Salzburg
Paracelsus Medical University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Payne SJ, Bowen RL, Jones JL, Wells CA (2008) Predictive markers in breast cancer-the present. Histopathology 52:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02897
2. Li J, Chen Z, Su K, Zeng J (2015) Clinicopathological classification and traditional prognostic indicators of breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 1:8500–8505
3. Harbeck N, Gnant M (2017) Breast cancer. Lancet 389:1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8
4. Marotta M, Onodera T, Johnson J, Budd GT, Watanabe T, Cui X, Giuliano AE, Niida A, Tanaka H (2017) Palindromic amplification of the ERBB2 oncogene in primary HER2-positive breast tumors. Sci Rep 7:41921. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41921
5. Moasser MM (2007) The oncogene HER2: its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis. Oncogene 26:6469–6487. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210477
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献