Abstract
Abstract
Poincaré invariance is a well-tested symmetry of nature and sits at the core of our description of relativistic particles and gravity. At the same time, in most systems Poincaré invariance is not a symmetry of the ground state and is hence broken spontaneously. This phenomenon is ubiquitous in cosmology where Lorentz boosts are spontaneously broken by the existence of a preferred reference frame in which the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. This motivates us to study scattering amplitudes without requiring invariance of the interactions under Lorentz boosts. In particular, using on-shell methods and assuming massless, relativistic and luminal particles of any spin, we show that the allowed interactions around Minkowski spacetime are severely constrained by unitarity and locality in the form of consistent factorization. The existence of an interacting massless spin-2 particle enforces (analytically continued) three-particle amplitudes to be Lorentz invariant, even those that do not involve a graviton, such as cubic scalar couplings. We conjecture this to be true for all n-particle amplitudes. Also, particles of spin S > 2 cannot self-interact nor can be minimally coupled to gravity, while particles of spin S > 1 cannot have electric charge. Given the growing evidence that free gravitons are well described by massless, luminal relativistic particles, our results imply that cubic graviton interactions in Minkowski must be those of general relativity up to a unique Lorentz-invariant higher-derivative correction of mass dimension 9. Finally, we point out that consistent factorization for massless particles is highly IR sensitive and therefore our powerful flat-space results do not straightforwardly apply to curved spacetime.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Reference82 articles.
1. R. Bluhm, Overview of the SME: Implications and phenomenology of Lorentz violation, Lect. Notes Phys. 702 (2006) 191 [hep-ph/0506054] [INSPIRE].
2. V. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation, arXiv:0801.0287 [INSPIRE].
3. J.D. Tasson, What Do We Know About Lorentz Invariance?, Rept. Prog. Phys. 77 (2014) 062901 [arXiv:1403.7785] [INSPIRE].
4. C.M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4 [arXiv:1403.7377] [INSPIRE].
5. S. Weinberg, What is quantum field theory, and what did we think it is?, in Conference on Historical Examination and Philosophical Reflections on the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, pp. 241–251, 3, 1996, hep-th/9702027 [INSPIRE].
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献