Abstract
AbstractCultural economics has largely looked toward environmental economics and used non-market valuation techniques such as contingent valuation to estimate the total economic value of cultural goods. These methods are well suited to the valuation of cultural heritage goods, where the benefits are mostly related to the level of supply and mainly take the form of existence and bequest values. This stands in contrast to cultural institutions such as theatres, libraries, exhibitions, and concerts, where the value is produced, when the goods are consumed. For this type of cultural goods, I suggest that cultural economics rather turn to find inspiration in the economics of education. The value of schooling can be divided into private returns and social returns (human capital externalities). Likewise, the value of cultural consumption can have a private and a public component, where I suggest labeling the public component cultural capital externalities. The idea is that when private consumption of arts and culture is taking place, the individual will accumulate cultural capital. This accumulated cultural capital can impact other people (e.g., through changed behavior, future decisions or interactions) and create externalities, i.e., the cultural capital externalities. The size of the externalities is expected to increase (or decrease) with the level of consumption. Without the consumption by the users, no externalities are produced. While this is one of the most fundamental arguments for cultural policy, it has not yet been extensively studied within cultural economics.
Funder
Augustinus Fonden
Copenhagen Business School
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D., & Angrist, J. (2000). How large are human-capital externalities? Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 15, 9–59.
2. Baldin, A., & Bille, T. (2023). The Lost value for users of cultural institutions during the Covid-19 pandemic: A life satisfaction approach. International Review of Economics, 70(2), 257–281.
3. Bell, B., Coata, R., & Machin, S. (2022). Why does education reduce crime? Journal of Political Economy, 130(3), 732–752.
4. Bille, T. (2022). Where do we stand today? An essay on cultural policy in Denmark, In: Sakarias Sokka (ed): Cultural Policy in the Nordic Region, Kulturanalys Norden.
5. Bille, T., and Nyborg Storm, H. (2022). The benefits and attractiveness of local theatres: Comedy or Shakespeare—Does it matter? In: Hanna Nyborg Storm: Cultural Institutions and Attractiveness. How Cultural Institutions Contribute to the Development of Regions and Local Communities, PhD Thesis, Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The “Bloomington Issue”;Journal of Cultural Economics;2024-08-10