Author:
Kruschwitz Lutz,Löffler Andreas
Abstract
AbstractThe traditional literature on the CAPM assumes that investor’s tax payments simply vanish from the model. This assumption is not at all consistent with the actual behavior of the Treasury. The theory of general equilibrium states that an interest rate rf = 0 will not affect prices if taxes are introduced. We show that this result can be extended to the CAPM if the tax payments are redistributed among investors.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Bottazzi, Jean-Marc, Thorsten Hens, and Andreas Löffler (1998): Market Demand Functions in the Capital Asset Pricing Model, Journal of Economic Theory, 79 (2): 192–206.
2. Brennan, Michael J. (1970): Taxes, Market Valuation and Corporate Financial Policy, National Tax Journal, 23: 417–427.
3. Briys, Eric and Louis Eeckhoudt (1985): Relative Risk Aversion in Comparative Statics: Comment, American Economic Review, 75 (1): 281–283.
4. Buchholz, Wolfgang and Kai A. Konrad (2000): Risiko und Steuern, in: Wolfgang Buchholz and Alois Oberhauser (eds.): Probleme der Besteuerung, 3, Duncker & Humblot: Berlin, 63–139.
5. Eikseth, Hans M. and Snorre Lindset (2009): A Note on Capital Asset Pricing and Heterogeneous Taxes, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (3): 573–577.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献