Abstract
AbstractVirtual rewards, such as badges, are commonly used in online platforms as incentives for promoting contributions from a userbase. It is widely accepted that such rewards “steer” people’s behaviour towards increasing their rate of contributions before obtaining the reward. This paper provides a new probabilistic model of user behaviour in the presence of threshold rewards, such a badges. We find, surprisingly, that while steering does affect a minority of the population, the majority of users do not change their behaviour around the achievement of these virtual rewards. In particular, we find that only approximately 5–30% of Stack Overflow users who achieve the rewards appear to respond to the incentives. This result is based on the analysis of thousands of users’ activity patterns before and after they achieve the reward. Our conclusion is that the phenomenon of steering is less common than has previously been claimed. We identify a statistical phenomenon, termed “Phantom Steering”, that can account for the interaction data of the users who do not respond to the reward. The presence of phantom steering may have contributed to some previous conclusions about the ubiquity of steering. We conduct a qualitative survey of the users on Stack Overflow which supports our results, suggesting that the motivating factors behind user behaviour are complex, and that some of the online incentives used in Stack Overflow may not be solely responsible for changes in users’ contribution rates.
Funder
Commonwealth Foundation
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Hardware and Architecture,Human-Computer Interaction,Information Systems,Software
Reference29 articles.
1. Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J (2013) Steering user behavior with badges. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, pp 95–106
2. Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J (2014) Engaging with massive online courses. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, pp 687–698
3. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin
4. Blei DM (2014) Build, compute, critique, repeat: data analysis with latent variable models. Annu Rev Stat Appl 1:203–232
5. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022