Abstract
AbstractMulti-objective optimization problems and their solution algorithms are of great importance as single-objective optimization problems are not usually a true representation of many real-world problems. In general, multi-objective optimization problems result in a large set of Pareto optimal solutions. Each solution in this set is optimal with some trade-offs. Therefore, it is difficult for the decision-maker to select a solution, especially in the absence of subjective or judgmental information. Moreover, an analysis of all the solutions is computationally expensive and, hence, not practical. Thus, researchers have proposed several techniques such as clustering and ranking of Pareto optimal solutions to reduce the number of solutions. The ranking methods are often used to obtain a single solution, which is not a good representation of the entire Pareto set. This paper deviates from the common approach and proposes a novel graph-theoretical clustering method. The quality of the clustering based on the Silhouette score is used to determine the number of clusters. The connectivity in the objective space is used to find representative solutions for clusters. One step forward, we identify ‘extreme solutions’. Hence, the reduced set contains both extreme solutions and representative solutions. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed method by using different 3D and 8D benchmark Pareto fronts as well as Pareto fronts from a case study in Royal Australian Navy. Results revealed that the reduced set obtained from the proposed method outperforms that from theK-means clustering, which is the most popular traditional clustering approach in Pareto pruning.
Funder
University of New South Wales
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Management Science and Operations Research,Control and Optimization,Computer Science Applications,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference55 articles.
1. Abido, M.A.: Multiobjective optimal VAR dispatch using strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 730–736. IEEE (2006)
2. Adra, S.F., Fleming, P.J.: Diversity management in evolutionary many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 15(2), 183–195 (2010)
3. Ahuja, R.K., Magnanti, T.L., Orlin, J.B.: Network flows (1988)
4. Antipova, E., Pozo, C., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Boer, D., Cabeza, L.F., Jiménez, L.: On the use of filters to facilitate the post-optimal analysis of the pareto solutions in multi-objective optimization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 74, 48–58 (2015)
5. Ayadi, O., Felfel, H., Masmoudi, F.: Analytic hierarchy process-based approach for selecting a pareto-optimal solution of a multi-objective, multi-site supply-chain planning problem. Eng. Optim. 49(7), 1264–1280 (2017)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献