Abstract
AbstractDeterministic direct-search methods have been successfully used to address real-world challenging optimization problems, including the beam angle optimization (BAO) problem in radiation therapy treatment planning. BAO is a highly non-convex optimization problem typically treated as the optimization of an expensive multi-modal black-box function which results in a computationally time consuming procedure. For the recently available modalities of radiation therapy with protons (instead of photons) further efficiency in terms of computational time is required despite the success of the different strategies developed to accelerate BAO approaches. Introducing randomization into otherwise deterministic direct-search approaches has been shown to lead to excellent computational performance, particularly when considering a reduced number (as low as two) of random poll directions at each iteration. In this study several randomized direct-search strategies are tested considering different sets of polling directions. Results obtained using a prostate and a head-and-neck cancer cases confirmed the high-quality results obtained by deterministic direct-search methods. Randomized strategies using a reduced number of polling directions showed difficulties for the higher dimensional search space (head-and-neck) and, despite the excellent mean results for the prostate cancer case, outliers were observed, a result that is often ignored in the literature. While, for general global optimization problems, mean results (or obtaining the global optimum once) might be enough for assessing the performance of the randomized method, in real-world problems one should not disregard the worst-case scenario and beware of the possibility of poor results since, many times, it is only possible to run the optimization problem once. This is even more important in healthcare applications where the mean patient does not exist and the best treatment possible must be assured for every patient.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Alberto, P., Nogueira, F., Rocha, H., Vicente, L.N.: Pattern search methods for user-provided points: application to molecular geometry problems. SIAM J. Optim. 14, 1216–1236 (2004)
2. American Cancer Society. Global cancer facts & figures (4th Edition). https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-factsand- statistics/global-cancer-facts-and-figures/global-cancer-facts-andfigures- 4th-edition.pdf
3. Audet, C., Dennis, J.E., Jr.: Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 188–217 (2006)
4. Bertsimas, D., Cacchiani, V., Craft, D., Nohadani, O.: A hybrid approach to beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Comput. Oper. Res. 40, 2187–2197 (2013)
5. Breedveld, S., Craft, D., van Haveren, R., Heijmen, B.: Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277, 1–19 (2019)