Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Twenty-five years ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the Guide to Good Prescribing (GGP), followed by the accompanying Teacher’s Guide to Good Prescribing (TGGP). The GGP is based on a normative 6-step model for therapeutic reasoning and prescribing, and provides a six-step guide for students to the process of rational prescribing.
Method
We reviewed the need to update both WHO publications by evaluating their use and impact, including new (theoretical) insights and demands. Based on information from literature, Internet, and other (personal) sources, we draw the following conclusions.
Results
1. An update of the GGP and TGGP, both in terms of content and form, is necessary because of the current need for these tools (irrational medicine use and unavailability of medicines), the lack of similar documents, and the lack of connection with recent developments, such as Internet and modern education; 2. The basic (6-step) model of the GGP is effective in terms of rational prescribing in the undergraduate situation and is still consistent with current theories about (context) learning, clinical decision-making, and clinical practice; 3. The dissemination and introduction of the GGP and TGGP in education has been successful so far, but is still not optimal because of lack of support and cooperation.
Conclusions
On the basis of the evaluation results, a plan for the revision of the GGP and TGGP is presented.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,General Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. De Vries TP, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV et al (1994) Guide to good prescribing. World Health Organisation, Geneva
2. Hogerzeil HV, Barnes KI, Henning RH, Kocabasoglu YE, Moller H, Smith AJ, Summers RS, de Vries TP (2001) Teacher’s guide to good prescribing. WHO, Geneva
3. Richir MC, Tichelaar J, Geijteman ECT, de Vries TPGM (2008) Teaching clinical phamacology and therapeutics with emphasis on the therapeutic reasoning of undergraduate medical students. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64(2):217–224
4. Hogerzeil H (2012) Note for the Record. WHO, Geneva
5. de Vries TP, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV, Bapna JS, Bero L, Kafle KK, Af M, Santoso B, Smith AJ (1995) Impact of a short course in pharmacotherapy for undergraduate medical students: an international randomised controlled study. Lancet 346(8988):1454–1457
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献