Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In aut-idem or generic substitution, discrepancies between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) referring to the same active substance (AS) may cause difficulties regarding informed consent and medical liability. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of such discrepancies are insufficiently studied, impeding harmonization of same-substance SmPCs and compromising safe drug treatment.
Methods
SmPCs of the one hundred most frequently prescribed ASs in Germany were analyzed for discrepancies in the presentation of indications (Inds) and contraindications (CInds). Inclusion and exclusion criteria of drugs/SmPCs were chosen according to the standards of the aut-idem substitution in Germany.
Results
According to the study protocol, we identified 1486 drugs, of which 1426 SmPCs could be obtained. 41% respectively 65% of the ASs had same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC in the number of listed Inds respectively CInds. The number of listed Inds/CInds varied considerably between same-substance SmPCs with maximum ranges in Inds of 7 in amoxicillin, and in CInds of 11 in lisinopril. Many ASs had large proportions (> 50%) of associated same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC. A considerable proportion of ASs had same-substance SmPCs with formal and content-related differences other than the discrepancy in the number of Inds/CInds.
Conclusion
This evaluation of same-substance SmPCs shows a clear lack of harmonization of same-substance SmPCs. Considering that generic substitution has become the rule and that physicians usually do not know which drug the patient receives in the pharmacy, these discrepancies raise several questions, that require a separate legal evaluation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,General Medicine
Reference18 articles.
1. Korzilius H (2002) Aut-idem-Regelung: Unglückliche Umstände. Dtsch Arztebl 99(13):A822–A824
2. Schwabe U, Paffrath D, Ludwig W, Klauber J (eds) (2019) Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2019. Springer, Berlin
3. Margolese H, Wolf Y, Desmarais J, JE, Beauclair L (2010) Loss of response after switching from brand name to generic formulations: three cases and a discussion of key clinical considerations when switching. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 25(3):180–182
4. Cesak G, Rokita K, Dabowska M, Sejbuk-Rozbicka K, Zaremba A, Mirowska-Guzel D, Balkowiec-Iskra E (2016) Therapeutic equivalence of antipsychotics and antidepessants - A systematic review. Pharmacol Rep 68(2):217–223
5. Desmarais J, Beauclair L, Margolese H (2011) Switching from brand-name to generic psychotropic medications: a literature review. CNS Neuro Sci Ther 17(6):750–760
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献