Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Social media enlarge the impact of health and fitness trends on body image and lifestyle choices, also in birthing parents. A new and yet to investigate social media trend addressing expectant mothers is “Belly Only Pregnancy”. This qualitative study sought to define this new trend and clarify whether content related to this trend might disrupt body image or eating habits in expectant mothers.
Methods
Picture and text data were gathered on a key day by screening Instagram and blog posts including or linking #bellyonlypregnancy. The identified data were categorized applying qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA software version 2018.
Results
Three hundred and fifty-one Instagram and eight blog posts were included. Our qualitative analysis’ results indicated that the term “Belly Only Pregnancy” was used for describing: (1) The phenotype of an athletic woman whose abdominal size enlarges during pregnancy while not gaining excessive fat tissue. (2) An active lifestyle during pregnancy consisting of healthy nutrition and regular exercise pursuing goals like fast weight loss post-partum. Also, bodily, and mental gestational changes and the feasibility of this lifestyle were discussed.
Conclusion
A “Belly Only Pregnancy” allegorizes an ideal body type for expecting mothers. Especially women with increased vulnerability for an eating disorder might be negatively affected by the consumption of content linked to this trend. However, the positive effects of a healthy diet and exercise should not be denied keeping into account the increasing prevalence of obesity and gestational diabetes.
Level of evidence
Level III: Evidence obtained from cohort or case-control analytic studies.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology
Reference46 articles.
1. Weyerstahl T, Stauber M (2013) Klinikleitfaden Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe. In: Goerke K, Steller J, Valet A (eds) Duale Reihe Gynäkologie, 4th edn. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 451–457
2. Haslam DM, Tee A, Baker S (2017) The use of social media as a mechanism of social support in parents. J Child Fam Stud 26(7):2026–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0716-6
3. Boepple L, Thompson JK (2016) A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. Int J Eat Disord 49(1):98–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22403
4. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Skouteris H, Watson BE, Hill B (2013) Body dissatisfaction during pregnancy: a systematic review of cross-sectional and prospective correlates. J Health Psychol 18(11):1411–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105312462437
5. Haferkamp N, Krämer NC (2011) Social comparison 2.0: examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 14(5):309–314. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0120
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献