How useful is the concept of the ‘harm threshold’ in reproductive ethics and law?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How useful is the concept of the ‘harm threshold’ in reproductive ethics and law?

Published:2014-08-09 Issue:5 Volume:35 Page:321-336
ISSN:1386-7415
Container-title:Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Theor Med Bioeth

Author:

Smajdor Anna

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11017-014-9302-8.pdf

Reference23 articles.

1. Pattinson, Shaun D. 2002. Reproductive cloning: Can cloning harm the clone? Medical Law Review 10(3): 295–307.

2. Macklin, Ruth. 2002. Cloning and public policy. In A companion to genethics, ed. Justine Burley and John Harris, 206–215. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

3. Isasi, Rosariao, and Bartha M. Knoppers. 2006. National regulatory frameworks regarding human reproductive genetic testing. Genetics and Public Policy Center. http://www.dnapolicy.org/pdf/geneticTesting.pdf . Accessed April 29, 2014.

4. Harris, John. 2005. Reproductive liberty, disease and disability. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10: 13–16.

5. Ripstein, Arthur. 2006. Beyond the harm principle. Philosophy & Public Affairs 34(3): 215–245.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ethical Issues in the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Women over Age 40;Optimizing the Management of Fertility in Women over 40;2022-09-30

2. Anti-essentialism, modal relativity, and alternative material-origin counterfactuals;Synthese;2021-04-28

3. The complex case of Ellie Anderson;Journal of Medical Ethics;2021-03-15

4. The Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology to Create Posthumous Grandchildren;International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family;2021-01-01

5. Blurring boundaries. Interviews with PGT couples about comprehensive chromosome screening;European Journal of Medical Genetics;2019-12