Mandatory neurotechnological treatment: ethical issues-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Mandatory neurotechnological treatment: ethical issues

Published:2014-01-10 Issue:1 Volume:35 Page:59-72
ISSN:1386-7415
Container-title:Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Theor Med Bioeth

Author:

Focquaert Farah

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11017-014-9276-6.pdf

Reference48 articles.

1. Hare, Robert D. 2003. Manual for the Hare psychopathy checklist. Revised 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

2. Hare, Robert D. 2006. Psychopathy: A clinical and forensic overview. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 29: 709–724.

3. Focquaert, Farah, Andrea L. Glenn, and Adrian Raine. Forthcoming, 2014. Psychopathy and free will. In Free will and the brain, ed. Walter Glannon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Fischer, John M., and Mark S.J. Ravizza. 1998. Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Anderson, Nathaniel E., and Kent A. Kiehl. 2012. The psychopath magnetized: Insights from brain imaging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16: 52–60.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neurolaw;2024-02-27

2. Should Prisoners’ Participation in Neuroscientific Research Always Be Disregarded When Making Decisions About Early Release?;Philosophy and Medicine;2023

3. Ought the State Use Non-Consensual Treatment to Restore Trial Competence?;Res Publica;2022-09-15

4. ‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: Requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection;Bioethics;2022-05-19

5. Moral Neuroenhancement for Prisoners of War;Neuroethics;2022-03-18