Author:
Westphal Rebecca,Sornette Didier
Abstract
AbstractUsing a previously validated agent-based model with fundamentalists and chartists, we investigate the usefulness and impact of direct market intervention. The policy maker diagnoses bubbles by forming an expectation of the future returns, then invests in burgeoning bubbles to develop a sufficient inventory of the risky asset in order to be able to sell adequate amounts of the overpriced asset later countercyclically to fight market exuberance. Preventing bubbles and crashes, this market intervention improves all analysed market return metrics, volatility, skewness, kurtosis and VaR, without affecting long-term growth. This increases the Sharpe ratios of noise traders and of fundamentalists by approximately 28% and 45% respectively. The results are robust even for substantially miscalibrated long-term expected returns.
Funder
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference51 articles.
1. Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D., & Hungi, N. (2005). Applied rasch measurement: A book of exemplars. Springer.
2. Bao, T., & Zong, J. (2019). The impact of interest rate policy on individual expectations and asset bubbles in experimental markets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 107, 103735.
3. Barras, L., Scaillet, O., & Wermers, R. (2010). False discoveries in mutual fund performance: Measuring luck in estimated alphas. The Journal of Finance, 65, 179–216.
4. Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (2000). Monetary policy and asset price volatility.
5. Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (2001). Should central banks respond to movements in asset prices? American Economic Review, 91, 253–257.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献