Abstract
AbstractNon-sampling errors can generally be divided into three types: sampling frame errors, non-response errors and measurement errors. Missing target units in the sampling frame, improper handling of non-responses, and misreporting or underreporting of key variables in the questionnaire can all cause deviations in a survey’s results. The widespread application of Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) systems and the inclusion of administrative records from government sources in surveys has strengthened the ability to control non-sampling errors. Taking a national fertility sampling survey as an example, this study summarizes the sources of various non-sampling errors and explains how to harness big data resources such as administrative records to control non-sampling errors throughout the survey. The study analyzes the impact of three types of non-sampling errors on the results of the fertility survey and examines the strategies used to address the problems caused by these non-sampling errors. The findings indicate that non-sampling errors were the main source of total error in the survey, and that the errors found came mainly from sampling frame errors; non-response errors and measurement errors were controlled and had little impact on the survey results.
Funder
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference20 articles.
1. Bethlehem, J. (2009). Applied survey methods: A statistical perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Chen, W., & Duan, Y. (2019). China’s fertility level and trend over the past 10 years. Population Research, 43(01), 3–17. in Chinese.
3. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
4. Couper, M. P., & Ofstedal, M. B. (2009). Keeping in contact with mobile sample members. Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, 185.
5. Erciulescu, A. L., Franco, C., Lahiri, P. (2021). Use of administrative records in small area estimation. Ch. 10 in Asaph Young Chun, Michael D. Larsen, Gabriele Durrant, Jerome P. Reiter (eds.) Administrative Records for Survey Methodology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119272076.ch10.