Author:
Leeuwen Jordy K. van,Landman Annemarie,Groen Eric L.,Mumaw Randall J.,Stroosma Olaf,Paassen Marinus M. van,Mulder Max
Abstract
AbstractPrevious research indicated a need to improve pilot training with regard to understanding of autopilot logic and behavior, especially in non-routine situations. Therefore, we tested the effect of problem-based exploratory training on pilots’ understanding of autopilot functions. Using a moving-base flight simulator, general aviation pilots (n = 45) were trained to diagnose failures either without foreknowledge and guidance (exploratory group), without foreknowledge but with some guidance (exploratory-guidance group) or with foreknowledge and full guidance (control group). They subsequently performed six test scenarios in which their understanding of the effects of failures was tested by requiring them to deduce the failures and select autopilot modes that were still functioning. Those who received exploratory training with guidance were significantly more likely than the other groups to diagnose failures correctly. The exploratory training group also selected the most appropriate functioning autopilot modes significantly faster than the control group. The results suggest that exploratory training with an appropriate level of guidance is useful for gaining a practical understanding of autopilot logic and behavior. Exploratory training may help to improve transfer of training to operational practice, and prevent automation surprises and accidents.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (2014) Global aviation safety study: a review of 60 years of improvement in aviation safety (Tech. Rep.). Retrieved from https://www.agcs.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/agcs/agcs/reports/AGCSGlobal-Aviation-Safety-2014-report.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2020
2. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM (1980) Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education, vol 1. Springer Publishing Company, New York
3. Carolan TF, Hutchins SD, Wickens CD, Cumming JM (2014) Costs and benefits of more learner freedom: meta-analyses of exploratory and learner control training methods. Hum Factors 56(5):999–1014
4. de Boer RJ, Hurts K (2017) Automation surprise: results of a field survey of Dutch pilots. Aviat Psychol Appl Hum Factors 7(1):28–41
5. de Muynck R, van Hesse M (1990) The a priori simulator software package of the Piper PA34 Seneca III (Unpublished MSc. report). Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft