Using problem-based exploratory training to improve pilot understanding of autopilot functions

Author:

Leeuwen Jordy K. van,Landman Annemarie,Groen Eric L.,Mumaw Randall J.,Stroosma Olaf,Paassen Marinus M. van,Mulder Max

Abstract

AbstractPrevious research indicated a need to improve pilot training with regard to understanding of autopilot logic and behavior, especially in non-routine situations. Therefore, we tested the effect of problem-based exploratory training on pilots’ understanding of autopilot functions. Using a moving-base flight simulator, general aviation pilots (n = 45) were trained to diagnose failures either without foreknowledge and guidance (exploratory group), without foreknowledge but with some guidance (exploratory-guidance group) or with foreknowledge and full guidance (control group). They subsequently performed six test scenarios in which their understanding of the effects of failures was tested by requiring them to deduce the failures and select autopilot modes that were still functioning. Those who received exploratory training with guidance were significantly more likely than the other groups to diagnose failures correctly. The exploratory training group also selected the most appropriate functioning autopilot modes significantly faster than the control group. The results suggest that exploratory training with an appropriate level of guidance is useful for gaining a practical understanding of autopilot logic and behavior. Exploratory training may help to improve transfer of training to operational practice, and prevent automation surprises and accidents.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (2014) Global aviation safety study: a review of 60 years of improvement in aviation safety (Tech. Rep.). Retrieved from https://www.agcs.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/agcs/agcs/reports/AGCSGlobal-Aviation-Safety-2014-report.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2020

2. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM (1980) Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education, vol 1. Springer Publishing Company, New York

3. Carolan TF, Hutchins SD, Wickens CD, Cumming JM (2014) Costs and benefits of more learner freedom: meta-analyses of exploratory and learner control training methods. Hum Factors 56(5):999–1014

4. de Boer RJ, Hurts K (2017) Automation surprise: results of a field survey of Dutch pilots. Aviat Psychol Appl Hum Factors 7(1):28–41

5. de Muynck R, van Hesse M (1990) The a priori simulator software package of the Piper PA34 Seneca III (Unpublished MSc. report). Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3